[Image] GFOA Logo
[Image] GFOA Public Investor

January 7, 2005


Volume 23, Number 1

Inside This Issue

Cook County Invests $433 Million Through Online Auction

2005 Legislative Outlook for Public Investors

GFOA Publishes Book on Banking Services

Call for Awards for Excellence Submissions

Break-Even Analysis in Excel

2004 Public Investor Index

Performance Benchmarks

Panel of Economists

Databank

Interest Rate Outlook

Enclosures


Cook County Invests $433 Million Through Online Auction

By Stephen Jackson

On December 7, 2004, Cook County, Illinois, used the GFOA YieldAdvantage Web auction platform to invest nearly a half billion dollars of bond proceeds. In so doing, the county realized yields that easily surpassed its own benchmarks for performance. County Chief Financial Officer Tom Glaser conducted two consecutive 30-minute auctions to place the funds. He expressed his enthusiasm for the platform saying, “We can provide good stewardship of county funds in a streamlined and transparent process using YieldAdvantage™. I can examine each bid in detail as they are submitted, not only ensuring compliance with our investment policy, but also ensuring that there is good competition among financial institutions.”

In the first auction, a 24-month laddered portfolio of $363 million allowed for bids of high-grade commercial paper, U.S. Treasury, and agency issues. The laddered portfolio was structured to meet the county's estimated draw schedule for its capital projects. A benefit of this approach is that it also protects the county against reinvestment risk by evenly spreading the maturities over two years. With this regular cash flow the county can, over time, reinvest at prevailing rates and capture any yield pick-up in a rising interest rate environment. Seven institutions submitted a total of 106 bids during this “sealed-bid” auction. All seven firms had at least one first-place bid for a maturity in the portfolio by the end of the auction, resulting in an award to each of the bidders.

The second solicitation sought to place $70 million in a guaranteed investment contract (GIC). The auction was conducted in an “open-bid” format that informed bidders of the standing of their bid compared to all other bids (but not the amount of the leading bid or the identity of that bidder) and then permitted each firm to submit bids at increased rates of return to the county. This dynamic environment stimulated spirited auction activity; 11 bidders submitted 58 bids, with an accepted rate of 2.711 percent.

Because of the bid activity at the end of the auction period, the auction's two-minute rule was invoked. This feature extends the auction period when a bid is submitted during its last two minutes. This extension accommodates later bidding and avoids prematurely concluding auction activity.

Exhibit 1 illustrates the bid activity of the firms with the four highest bids at auction's end, demonstrating how the bids not only improved over time but also converged toward a higher level. The leading bid at the end of the GIC auction was 11 basis points better than the cover bidder’s initial bid, and 71 basis points better than the initial bid (not shown in the exhibit)—indicating how the dynamic nature of the auction improved bids, compared to the static process of manually obtaining quotes.

Exhibit 1 - Select Bid Activity on Cook County’s YieldAdvantage™ Auction

So how did the county fare using their Treasury benchmark? The 2.78 percent aggregate rate on the laddered portfolio and the 2.71 percent yield on the GIC were both 25 basis points (0.25 percent) higher than Treasury securities with a comparable term.

YieldAdvantage™ offers state and local investment officers a number of advantages: automating the process of investing funds, performing calculations necessary to analyze each bid, providing a complete record of auction activity for audit purposes, and creating a competitive investment environment where the initial bid can be the starting point for realizing improved yield.

To learn more about how you can streamline your investing and improve your yield using YieldAdvantage™, please visit our Web site: www.gfoayield.com or contact GFOA staff member Sofia Anastopoulos at 312/977-9700, ext. 227 or sanastopoulos@gfoa.org.

Stephen Jackson is a consultant/policy analyst with the GFOA Research and Consulting Center.


2005 Legislative Outlook for Public Investors

By Susan Gaffney

As we begin the New Year, the policy rumblings in Washington are loudest regarding Social Security and major tax reform. With a focus on these major issues and an enhanced Republican majority, Congress and the White House are primed to move right out of the box with these initiatives. Closely behind in the congressional agenda are: health care reform, a six-year transportation funding bill, and telecommunications reform.

This leaves little room on the front burner for major banking initiatives. However, as was the case with the past Congress, leaders in the Senate Banking and Financial Services Committees will likely re-introduce key pieces of banking legislation that are of interest to local and state treasurers.

Bankruptcy Reform. In 2004, bankruptcy reform failed to be completed for the eighth year in a row, and while it is likely that legislation will be re-introduced in the 109th Congress, agreement on the composition of the reform bill may continue to be elusive. Local and state governments will want to keep a close eye to ensure that debt owed to governments—from those filing for bankruptcy—will receive a priority status for repayment.

FDIC Reform. The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2003 overwhelmingly passed the House two years ago, but failed to receive the attention of the Senate. The measure would have assisted local and state governments by increasing the insurance on in-state deposits to the lesser of $2 million or the standard maximum deposit insurance plus 80 percent of the municipal deposits in excess of that amount. Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and the White House weighed in with their opposition to the legislation. Although there will likely be strong bi-partisan support to help protect government bank deposits, because of powerful opposition it is unlikely that it will gain the traction needed to move forward and take effect.

SLGS Regulations. One issue that is guaranteed to be addressed in 2005 is changes to the State and Local Government Securities (SLGs) program. Late in 2003, the Treasury Department proposed regulations that would severely impact the program, and likely curtail its use by local and state governments. As proposed, the changes would:

  • limit the daily trading window from 10 a.m. - 6 p.m. Eastern Standard time;
  • punish issuers who cancel their subscriptions; and
  • limit the funds that can be invested in SLGS.

While the proposal outlined administrative burdens that the Bureau of Public Debt faces, GFOA and other public finance industry organizations commented that Treasury should implement a Web-based system and incorporate other agreed-upon standards prior to implementing other provisions that would likely force issuers into the open market, and increase costs to local and state governments. Treasury received comments, including those from GFOA, in November, and is likely to act in the first half of 2005.

Of particular concern is that Treasury has not embraced the notion of holding public hearings on the matter, nor talking in-depth with the issuers or other stakeholders in the public finance community to carefully review the best methods to address their concerns without adversely impacting local and state governments. We will continue to push for a dialogue and express our concerns about the severity of their proposed changes. GFOA's letter to Treasury on this matter may be viewed on the GFOA's Web site.

If you have any comments or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact GFOA's Federal Liaison Center in Washington, D.C., at 202/393-8020.

Susan Gaffney is the director of the GFOA Federal Liaison Center in Washington D.C.


GFOA Publishes Book on Banking Services

GFOA has issued an all-new edition of the leading publication on banking services, Banking Services: A Guide for Governments. Written by a team of banking industry professionals and government finance officers experienced in banking relations, the book provides a comprehensive overview of the various services banks provide to support government cash management operations. It also provides guidance on managing the procurement process and oversight of the banking relationship. Please refer to the enclosed brochure for more information about this comprehensive guide to banking services.


Call for Awards for Excellence Submissions

GFOA is seeking applications for the 2005 Awards for Excellence. GFOA recognizes outstanding initiatives in the areas of cash management, budgeting, pension/benefits, and other areas of public finance. See GFOA's Web site under Award Programs for more details on how to apply. The deadline is January 31, 2005.


Break-Even Analysis in Excel

In last month's issue of Public Investor, the method of break-even analysis was presented, using software provided by Bloomberg. Since Bloomberg is an expensive subscription-based service, many treasurers may not have access to a Bloomberg “terminal.” Most do have access to common spreadsheet software like Excel or Lotus 1-2-3, and one Public Investor subscriber illustrates how break-even analysis can be done using a spreadsheet.

Investment Date Maturity Date Rate

Option A
11/12/04 10/31/06 2.85%
Option B (1) 11/12/04 10/31/05 2.48%
Break Even Calculation      

Option B (2)
10/31/05 10/31/06 3.21%

Essentially break-even analysis requires creating a three-row table that allows for a comparison between a single security having a relatively long maturity and two short-term securities that, together, have the same maturity as the single security. For example, in the exhibit below, Option A (a two-year) pays nearly 40 basis points more on an annual basis. For Option B to be a better option, short-term interest rates would have to increase by a significant amount—to 3.21 percent or over 70 basis points relative to the current yield on a one-year security—to overcome this hurdle. If interested, contact Nick Greifer at ngreifer@gfoa.org to obtain a copy.


2004 Public Investor Index

For your reference, the following table lists major articles appearing in Public Investor during 2004.
January
  • Public Investor Interviews GFOA Cash Management Committee
  • State Treasurers Respond to Mutual Fund Scandals
  • Insuring Treasurers Against Lawsuits
  • New York Fed Revises List of Primary Dealers
   
February
  • GFOA Pushes Positive Pay
  • States Oppose New Rules Preempting State Banking Oversight
  • Association Calls for Stricter Ethics for Fixed-Income Research
  • Cook County Boosts Yields through Online Auction
   
March
  • Public Investor Interviews Portfolio Managers
   
April
  • Fed Keeps Rates at Unprecedented Lows
  • Federal Government Issues New CRA Regulations
  • Getting Ready for Check 21
  • ACH Fraud a New Worry
   
May
  • Improving Local Government Investment Reports
  • GASB 40 Takes Effect Next Month
   
June
  • Late Trading and Market Timing: Implications for Fiduciaries
  • Federal Reserve: Use of Checks Continues Decline
  • Greenspan on Bank Risk
   
July
  • Keys to Performing a Successful Treasury RFP
  • GFOA Annual Conference Tackles Treasury Topics
   

August

  • Public Investor Interview on Best Practices for Investment Reporting
  • New GFOA e-Document Provides Roadmap for Prudent Investing
  • S&P Changes Name of Money Market Rating
  • Survey: Investors Stay Course on Investment Strategy
   
September
  • The Rewarded Risks of One to Three-Year Investments
  • Legislation Expands Use of CDARS for Investment Risk Management
   
October
  • Credit Card Acceptance: What to Negotiate
  • Check 21 to Take Effect This Month
  • New Banking Services Book Available
  • Long Bonds Surprise
   
November
  • Oil and Money: It's Different This Time
  • Rising Interest Rates and Step-Up Securities
  • Treasury Proposes Changes to the SLGS Program
   
December
  • Break-Even Analysis for Maturity Selection
  • Surety Bonds as an Alternative for Collateralizing Public Deposits
  • Congress Raises Debt Limit
  • GFOA to Offer New Investment Seminar


Panel of Economists

The 2005 Economy

This month, Public Investor asked its panel of economists to provide Public Investor readers with their forecast of the economy over the next six months commenting on economic growth, inflation, and interest rates.

Dr. Lacy Hunt expects a significant slowdown in 2005, with an increased risk of recession. He highlights several economic indicators that suggest weakness in the domestic and international economies. Consumer plans to buy vehicles, appliances, and homes are all dropping to record lows. The real average weekly earnings in November were 1.6 percent below the level of a year earlier, which was the weakest figure in almost eight years.

Although the index of leading indicators rose 0.2 percent in December, it declined in the five previous months. Internationally, recent data show that industrial production declined in Europe and Japan. In addition, the GDP for the 12 European Union nations in the Euro system grew at the slow pace of 1.2 percent in the third quarter. Hunt expects the long-term trend in interest rates to be downward.

Carl Tannenbaum expects some moderation in economic activity during the first six months of 2005. He predicts that GDP growth will average between 3.0 percent and 3.5 percent. Tannenbaum highlights several factors that will contribute to more moderate growth including: high energy prices, rising interest rates, and the absence of tax relief. He anticipates that the Federal Reserve will continue to raise the Fed Funds rate over the next six months, raising it to 3.0 percent by the middle of the year. Inflation should remain low, but oil prices are a wildcard.

RGM
Databank Analysis

GDP Grows at 4 Percent

Gross Domestic Product posted stronger than expected growth in the third quarter, increasing 4 percent. The most recent Federal Reserve “Beige Book” of economic activity generally reports continued economic growth. Eleven of the twelve Fed districts reported expanding economic activity. The districts with the strongest economic growth were New York, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Dallas. The Cleveland district reported little change in economic activity.

Looking ahead, some economists expect somewhat slower economic growth in 2005. The factors that may tend to dampen economic growth in the coming months include: rising interest rates, a slowing housing market, rising energy costs, and the reduced possibility that the federal government will provide further fiscal stimulus. The biannual Livingston survey of economists conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia predicts that real GDP will slow to 3.5 percent in 2005.

RGM

Databank
 

Current
Period

Previous
Period

Year
Ago

Economic Growth      
Real GDP growth III Q '04 IIQ '04 Year Ago
Annual rate, constant dollars 4.0 3.3 7.4

Retail sales

Nov Oct Year Ago
$ billions 344.38 344.04 321.20
Industrial production index Nov Oct 12 mo. chg.
Change, monthly and annually 0.2% 0.7% 3.8%
Leading indicators index Nov Oct 12 mo. chg.
Change, monthly and annually 0.1% -0.4% 0.9%
New housing starts Nov Oct Year Ago
Thousands of units, annualized 1,771 2,039 2,054
Purchasing Management Index Nov Oct Year Ago
Nati'l. Assoc. of Purchasing Management 57.8 56.8 61.3

Inflation

Consumer price index

Nov Oct 12 mo. chg.
Change, monthly and annually 0.2% 0.6% 3.6%

Producer price index

Nov Oct 12 mo. chg.

Change, monthly and annually, seasonally adjusted

0.5 1.7 5.0
GDP price deflator III Q '04 II Q '04 Year Ago
Annual rate 1.4 3.2 1.4
Unemployment rate Nov Oct Year Ago
BLS 5.4 5.5 6.13
Other      
Money market fund maturities Dec 21 Nov 18 Dec '03
Average portfolio maturity
(Money Fund Report Averages TM)
40 days 41 days 58 days

Interest Rate Analysis

Fed Continues to Raise Rates

The Fed continued its series of rate increases by raising the Fed Funds rate by 25 basis points to 2.25 percent at its most recent meeting on December 14. So far, the Fed has raised rates 125 basis points since it began tightening in June. The Fed Funds futures market expects the Fed to continue raising the Fed Funds rate at the current pace, and predicts that the Fed Funds rate will rise to 3.00 percent by July 2005. However, some Fed watchers anticipate that more moderate economic growth will cause the Fed to raise rates more gradually in 2005.

The biannual Livingston survey of economists predicts that interest rates will rise over the next two years. Forecasters predict that the three-month Treasury bill will rise to 2.8 percent by June 2005, 3.4 percent by December 2005, and 3.8 percent by December 2006. They predict that the 10-year Treasury note will rise to 5.2 percent by December 2005 and 5.5 percent by December 2006.

RGM

Interest Rate Outlook
The Public Investor's panel of eminent institutional economists projects interest rates for the first day of each forecast month. Averages are the midpoints between the arithmetic mean and the median of individual projections. The low and high individual forecasts illustrate the range.

Rate

February-05
Average
(Low-High)

April-05
Average
(Low-High)
July-05
Average
(Low-High)
Fed Funds
2.3
2.8

3.0

 
21/4 - 21/4
23/4 - 2 3/4
3 - 3
30-day prime bank (CD)
1.1
1.6
2.0
 
1 1/8 - 1 1/8
1 5/8 - 1 5/8
2 - 2
3-month T-bill yield
2.3
2.8
3.1
 
2 1/4 - 2 1/4
2 3/4 - 2 3/4
3 1/8 - 3 1/8
5-year Treasury note
3.8
3.9
4.1
 
3 3/4 - 3 3/4
3 7/8 - 3 7/8
4 1/8 - 4 1/8
30-year Treasury bond
4.5
4.6
4.8
 
4 1/2 - 4 1/2
4 5/8 - 4 5/8
4 3/4 - 4 3/4
Consensus Index*
100%
100%
100%
*Consensus index is the percentage of responses within 75 basis points (0.75 percent) of the average interest rate. Index measures the extent of panelists' agreement. If all forecasts are with 3/4 percent of the various averages for a given month, the consensus would be 100. If all responses fall at the extreme ends of a wide range, the index is 0.

Interest rate forecast panelists

Carl R. Tannenbaum

LaSalle Bank ABN/Amro


Performance Benchmarks

Public Investor Performance Indexes
The Public Investor 10-bill index
 

Quarterly/Monthly
Return

Annualized Returns Since
 
Index
Annualized
Jan.1, 2004
Jan. 1, 2003
Jan. 1, 2004 276.6328

1.0% (M)

1.1% 1.4%
Dec. 1, 2004 279.3854

1.6% (M)

1.1% 1.3%
Jan. 1, 2005 280.0245

2.8% (M)

1.9%(Q)

1.2% 1.2%
The Public Investor 10-bill index consists of 10 hypothetical Treasury bill investments, with an average maturity of approximately 80 days. Every other Thursday, a T-bill matures and proceeds are reinvested alternately in the three-month and six month T-bills. This rolling index provides a benchmark for evaluating cash management portfolios with biweekly payment and payroll requirements. The original value of the index was 97.6765 on July 1, 1984.
The money market fund index
 
Annualized Returns Since
  Average Return Jan. 1, 2004 Jan. 1, 2003
Jan. 1, 2004 0.5% 0.67% 1.61%
Dec. 1, 2004 1.2% 0.69% 1.33%
Jan. 1, 2005 1.5% 0.76% 0.82%
The money market fund index is the simple average of Money Fund Report Averages ™ seven-day money market fund indexes, as reported for the two weeks closest to the end of each month. The annualized return is calculated using these rates for a four-week period centering on the first of each month. The results should simulate returns from passive investment in an average money market fund.
S&P Rated LGIP Index (December 24, 2004)
7-day yield
30-day yield
Maturity (days)
1.94%
1.84%
43
This index is comprised of local government investment pools that are rated AAAm or AAm by Standard & Poor's and represents pools that strive to maintain a stable net asset value.
Key Rates: Cash Markets
Rate 12/31/04 Year Ago
Fed funds 1.96 0.94
CDs: Three months 2.50 1.08
CDs: Six months 2.74 1.12
BAs: One month 2.35 1.07
T-bills: 91-day yield 2.23 0.89
T-bills: 52-week yield 2.77 1.25
2Commercial paper, dealer-placed, 3 months 2.47 1.03
Bond Buyer 20-bond municipal index 4.49 4.60
Tax-exempt notes 2.08 1.17

Moving Averages

6-Month Treasury Bill

2-Year Treasury Note

30-Year Treasury Bond

Public Investor’s four-week moving averages are calculated as a simple average of Friday closing yield quotations for the most recently offered six-month Treasury bill (discount basis), two-year Treasury note, and 30-year Treasury bond. Moving averages are used by analysts to monitor trends and trend changes. Generally, interest rates are increasing (prices falling) when the moving average yield is rising and the current rate exceeds the moving average. Conversely, current yields below a declining moving average are associated with lower interest rates (high prices on fixed-income securities). Some market timers buy (or sell) longer maturities when current market yields fall below (or penetrate above) their moving averages.


Enclosures:


Executive Director/CEO Jeffrey Esser
Editor Nick Greifer
Contributing Staff R. Gregory Michel

The Public Investor is published monthly by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), 203 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL 60601. (312/977-9700; email: PublicInvestor@gfoa.org) Annual subscription rates are $55 for active GFOA members, $70 for associate GFOA members, and $85 for nonmembers. For reprint permission contact GFOA.

The information and opinions printed herein are from sources believed to be reliable, but GFOA makes no guarantee of accuracy. Opinions, forecasts and recommendations are offered by individuals and do not represent official GFOA policy positions. Nothing herein should be construed as a specific recommendation to buy or sell a financial security.

Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada
[ Archive ] [ Feedback ] [ e-Store ]